Daw Suu is not fit to rule Myanmar. ဒီလို ေခါင္းေဆာင္မ်ိဳး တုိင္းျပည္မွာ ၂၀၁၅ အာဏာ ရမယ္ ဆုိရင္ေတာ႔ အနာဂတ္ ရင္ေလးစရာပါ

If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor. If an elephant has its foot on the tail of a mouse and you say that you are neutral, the mouse will not appreciate your neutrality. Desmond Tutu

Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.
Martin Luther King Jr

Daw Suu should just say, if there is NO FOOD, they could eat Dan Pauk as they are Kalars. She is still PRETENDING not to know why and what happened…She is too naive to believe and just waiting the “President” Post…Myanmar Military would never give her…Except if she agree to be a Puppet President or Bayinkhan. What Rule of Law Daw Suu is talking?


Just Law of the Jungle only in Arakan and her Burma.
There is a MOBOCRACY, demoCRAZY or powercrazy in Myanmar.

She don’t know the problem after 5 mts!!! Justice delayed is JUSTICE DENIED!!! So…In conclusion, Daw Suu is not fit to be a leader if she don’t know the problem after 5 mts…Good leaders should know to react swiftly within minutes to control the problem….Now too much…people are dying…It is MORALLY IMPORTANT for a leader to stop ETHNIC CLEANSING. But anyway she already claimed that she does not like to be a moral leader.

Why she chooses to keep quiet on the Hate Speeches, protests and attacks on Non-Rohingya Myanmar Muslims? As a responsible political leader she should advice to stop all those activities. No need to side with the Muslims that they are right but just defuse the tensions repeatedly created by obvious Agent Provocateurs.

MY FRIEND WROTE>>>ကိုယ္စီးတဲ႔ ျမင္းအထီးလား အမလား မသိေတာ႔ဘူးလား။ ဒီလို ေခါင္းေဆာင္မ်ိဳး တုိင္းျပည္မွာ ၂၀၁၅ အာဏာ ရမယ္ ဆုိရင္ေတာ႔ မြတ္စလင္အပါအ၀င္ တုိင္းရင္းသားအားလံုး အတြက္ အနာဂတ္ ရင္ေလးစရာပါ ။

ရိုဟင္ဂ်ာ ဘယ္သူလဲဆိုတဲ႔ သမိုင္းေၾကာင္းကို ေမြးရာပါ သူမ မသိတာ မထူးဆန္းပါ ( အိန္ဒိယ မွာ ငယ္စဥ္ဘ၀ စာသင္ ၊ အင္ဂလန္မွာ ၾကီးျပင္း ၊ ဘူတန္ ကို ေယာက်ာ္းနဲ႔ အတူ ေလ႔လာ ဆိုေတာ႔ ျမန္မာျပည္အေၾကာင္း အေသအခ်ာ မသိတာ အျပစ္ျမင္စရာ မရွိပါ ) ။

သို႕ေသာ္ လည္း ပါတီႏိုင္ငံေရး လုပ္ျပီး တခ်ိန္မွာ ႏုိင္ငံ၏ ေခါင္းေဆာင္တစ္ေယာက္လုပ္မယ္႔ သူမတစ္ေယာက္အေနနဲ႔ ဒီအေရး အခင္းကိစၥ မွာ ” ဘယ္သူမွားသည္ မွန္သည္ မသိပါ ၊ ဘယ္သူဘက္က မွ မရပ္ပါဟု” ဆိုသည္မွာ တာ၀န္မဲ႔ ၇ာ က်လြန္းပါသည္။

၇ရွိထားသည္႔ ေအာက္စဖို႔ ဘဲြ႕ ကို အားနာဖို႔ ေကာင္းပါသည္။

ႏုိင္ငံတကာ မွာ ရွက္ဖို႕ ေကာင္းပါသည္။

အေမရိကန္ တခြင္ ျပဲျပဲစင္စင္ေအာင္ သြားျပီးေသာ္လည္း ရခို္င္ျပည္နယ္ကို သြားၾကည္႔ပါသလား ၊ ကခ်င္ျပည္နယ္ကို သြားၾကည္႔ပါသလား ၊ ၾကားျဖတ္ေရြးေကာက္ပဲြ မႏုိင္ခင္က ေတာဆင္းေတာင္ဆင္း မဲဆြယ္ခဲ႔ေပမယ္႔ ။ ပါလီမန္ထဲ ေရာက္ျပီးခါမွ ဘိုအင္းဂ်က္ ဘဲ စီးဖို႔စဥ္းစားေနေသာ သူမကို ေမးခြန္း၀ိုင္းထုတ္ၾကသည္မွာ – ” လူထူေခါင္းေဆာင္ ပီသရဲ႕လား ၊ ျငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရး အိုင္ကြန္ ပီသရဲ႕လား” ။

Tags: , , , , , , ,

5 Responses to “Daw Suu is not fit to rule Myanmar. ဒီလို ေခါင္းေဆာင္မ်ိဳး တုိင္းျပည္မွာ ၂၀၁၅ အာဏာ ရမယ္ ဆုိရင္ေတာ႔ အနာဂတ္ ရင္ေလးစရာပါ”

  1. drkokogyi Says:

    Above post is written in response to the following RFA news>>>႐ုိဟင္ဂ်ာဘက္က တစ္ဖက္သတ္ မရပ္တည္ဟု ေဒၚစုေျပာ

    ရခိုင္ျပည္နယ္အတြင္း ျဖစ္ပြားေနတဲ့ ပဋိပကၡမွာ မိမိအေနနဲ႔ ရိုဟင္ဂ်ာဘက္ကေန တစ္ဖက္သတ္ ရပ္တည္ေျပာဆိုေပးမွာ မဟုတ္ေၾကာင္း အမ်ိဳးသား ဒီမိုကေရစီအဖြဲ႕ခ်ဳပ္ ဥကၠဌ ျပည္သူ႔လႊတ္ေတာ္ ကိုယ္စားလွယ္ ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾက
    ည္ က ေျပာဆိုပါတယ္။

    ျပႆနာရဲ႕ အေၾကာင္းရင္းမွန္ကို မၾကည့္ဘဲ ႐ိုဟင္ဂ်ာဘက္က တစ္ဖက္သတ္ ရပ္တည္ေျပာဆိုမွာ မဟုတ္ေၾကာင္း၊ ဘယ္ဘက္ကိုမွလည္း တစ္ဖက္သတ္ ဘက္လိုက္မွာ မဟုတ္ေၾကာင္း ဘီဘီစီ သတင္းဌာနကို ေျပာဆိုခဲ့ပါတယ္။

    ရခိုင္အေရးမွာ ႏွစ္ဘက္လံုးက သည္းခံစိတ္ေမြးၾကဖို႔လိုပါတယ္။ တစ္ဖက္နဲ႔တစ္ဖက္ အျပန္အလွန္ သတ္ျဖတ္ေနၾက၊ သူ႔အိမ္၊ ကိုယ့္အိမ္ အျပန္အလွန္ မီး႐ွိဳ႕ေနၾကမယ္ဆိုရင္ ဘယ္လိုလုပ္ၿပီး ျပႆနာေျပလည္ႏိုင္မွာလဲ၊ ျပႆနာရဲ႕ တကယ့္အေျခခံ အရင္းအျမစ္ေတြကို မ႐ႈျမင္ မသံုးသပ္ဘဲ ပုဂိၢဳလ္ေရး ၾသဇာ အရွိန္အဝါ သံုးစြဲၿပီး ဘက္လိုက္ မေျပာဆိုသင့္ပါဘူး။

    တျခားအေျခခံအေၾကာင္းရင္းေတြကို မၾကည့္ခင္မွာ တရားဥပေဒစိုးမိုးမႈ ရွိေအာင္၊ လူအားလံုး လံုၿခံဳမႈရွိေအာင္ ပထမလုပ္ရပါမယ္။ ဘယ္ဘက္ကမွ မရပ္လို႔ မိမိအေပၚမေက်နပ္ၾကဘူးဆိုတာ သိပါတယ္။ ဒါေပမဲ့ မိမိအေနနဲ႔ ဘက္လိုက္ၿပီး မေျပာႏိုင္ပါဘူးလို႔ ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္က ေျပာပါတယ္။
    http://www.facebook.com/pages/RFA-Burmese/39218993127

  2. drkokogyi Says:

    Maung Zarni

    Mommy doesn’t love you anymore. She loves herself – and her own presidential ambitions – too much.

    The Dear Leader has spoken. Her words are good as smokescreen for western and Burmese imperialist interests. If you are on the receiving end of the “reforms” too bad.

  3. drkokogyi Says:

    Daw Suu has NO vision… “Where there is no vision, there is no hope.”
    George Washington Carver
    The ultimate test of the LADY is not where she stands in moments of comfort and moments of convenience, but where she stands in moments of challenge and moments of controversy.
    Adapted from the quote of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

  4. drkokogyi Says:

    Dr. Maung Zarni >>>The west itself was built on a global pile of mass graves – WWII alone killed 60 million humans. So, the reunion of delusional Burmese and the depraved western leaders is kinda like a grand finale. The West is not on higher moral ground. Plus it will never disown its celebrated proxy.
    Saya u kkg – i know you are outraged and betrayed by the Lady. please don’t waste your mental and intellectual energy on her. there is more to life and politics than what the Lady eats, or where she shits or what comes out of her mouth.

  5. drkokogyi Says:

    Better the devil you know than the angel you don’t’

    သုိ႔ေသာ္ (ဒီ သုိ႔ေသာ္က အေရးႀကီးပါတယ္။) BUT (this but is more imp) if we depend on Democratic forces…they have NO power. They R expected (EXPECTED from our side only) to change if they get the power but now they R all Racists, not better than military….

    At least if the military is sure that they have upperhand, cannot lost power and with international pressure they would likely (likely …optimistic view only) to treat the Muslims.

    If they have political problem or are going to lost power…they could be nasty as usual. (Got a notorious bad record)…

    They say that the devil (military) you know is better than Angle (we don’t know) Daw Suu…

    This is the shortened form of the full idiom, ‘better the devil you know than the devil you don’t’, and means that it is often better to deal with someone or something you are familiar with and know, even if they are not ideal, than take a risk with an unknown person or thing.

    I replied to myy friend who wrote>သူတုိ႔ေတြဟာ လူ႔အခြင့္အေရးႏွင့္ ဒီမုိကေရစီေရးမွာ လူမ်ိဳး ဘာသာမခဲြဘဲ တစ္ေျပးညီရပ္တည္ခဲ့မယ္လုိ႔ က်ေနာ္ေတာ့ ေမွ်ာ္လင့္ခဲ့တယ္။ သုိ႔ေသာ္ (ဒီ သုိ႔ေသာ္က အေရးႀကီးပါတယ္။) ျမန္မာ့ႏုိင္ငံေရး အခင္းအက်င္းကုိၾကည့္ရင္ ျမန္မာမြတ္စလင္ေတြအတြက္ ေရြးစရာလမ္း မရွိပါဘူး။ အားလုံးကုိ တုိက္လုိ႔ မျဖစ္ပါဘူး။ ပုိဆုိးတဲ့ စစ္အုပ္စုကုိ ပုိေကာင္းဟန္ရွိတဲ့ ဒီမုိကေရစီ အုပ္စုႏွင့္ ပူးေပါင္းတုိက္ရမွာပါဘဲ။ သုိ႔ေသာ္(ေနာက္ သုိ႔ေသာ္ တစ္ခု) ဒီမုိကေရစီ အုပ္စုေတြကုိ က်ေနာ္တုိ႔က ယုံမွတ္ျပီး ပုံအပ္လုိ႔ မရဘူး။ (သူတုိ႔ကုိ ယုံမွတ္ျပီး ပုံအပ္ႏုိင္တယ္လုိ႔ က်ေနာ္ထင္ခဲ့တယ္။) မိမိအခြင့္အလမ္းေတြအတြက္ မိမိကိုယ္သာ အားကုိးရမယ္။ သူတုိ႔ဆီက မေမွ်ာ္လင့္နဲ႔ဆုိတဲ့ အသိတစ္ခုကုိ ရလုိက္တယ္။

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: