Myanmar is ruled by a form of military feudalism that involves junking or misusing the country’s own religious and cultural traditions

Judge for yourself who is being truthful.

My late friend EGRESS’ Dr Nay Win Maung, and all Burma’s Third Way “gurus”, were al milk and honey about 2010 elections and the 2008 Constitution.

But Nay Win Maung is no more, and neither is his EGRESS: he would have realized he had been conned. Or would he?

The chances are he would have continued to put out pro-Thein Sein spins, as head of Myanmar Peace Center, having deluded himself as a “king maker”. But he left that mission for the pimps at the MPC today.

Here is what I said 4 years ago. Judge for yourself who is being truthful.
How Will Post-election Burma Look?
——————————————————————————–
By SIMON ROUGHNEEN Tuesday, October 5, 2010

——————————————————————————–
BANGKOK—The run-up to Burma’s Nov. 7 election has left observers and
policy wonks wondering whether the vote will facilitate some
opening-up inside the military-ruled country, despite the seemingly
overwhelming bias in favor of the army and its allies.

Some clues, it could be argued, might be found in the experiences of
other countries in the Southeast Asia region.

Indonesia left a long era of military dictatorship behind it in 1998,
when the Asian financial crisis precipitated the collapse of the
Suharto regime. Since then, the vast, multi-ethnic archipelago has
undergone a largely successful—if hardly flawless—transition to being
southeast Asia’s best-functioning democracy.

In 1986, soldiers refused to fire on protestors on the streets of
Manila, as mass protests backed by the Catholic Church helped bring
about the end of the Marcos dictatorship. During the 2007 Saffron
Revolution in Burma, some views held that a similar dynamic might
prevail once Buddhist monks took to the streets. Just as the armed
forces of the Philippines backed down when confronted by priests and
nuns, then surely the Tatmadaw would not harm the Sangha?

Events proved otherwise, and Dr Maung Zarni, a scholar at the London
School of Economics and an exiled Burmese dissident, says that the
military rulers of Burma are operating from a different template than
other Asian leaders, no matter how despotic.

“Even absolute monarchs and rulers elsewhere were constrained by the
Buddhist or Confucian norms that required them to rule in a
paternalistic manner,” he said. His remarks were part of a seminar
titled “Transitions to Democracy in Southeast Asia: Similarities and
Differences with the Upcoming Elections in Burma/Myanmar,” at
Bangkok’s Chulalongkorn University on Tuesday.

In contrast, “Burma is ruled by a form of military feudalism that
involves junking or misusing the country’s own religious and cultural
traditions,” he said, pointing to images of Burmese consular staff in
China prostrating themselves, in a display of faux Buddhist devotion,
before senior junta figures such as Shwe Mann and Than Shwe.

While Burma remains something of an embarrassment for Association of
Southeast Asian Nations (Asean) leaders, many of whom are in Brussels
now for a summit with European Union counterparts, other Asean members
cannot point to a linear or seamless transition from authoritarian
rule to democracy.

Youk Chhang, a survivor of the murderous Khmer Rouge regime in
Cambodia and now executive director of the Documentation Center of
Cambodia, reminded the gathering that the 1993 United Nations-backed
elections in his country were won by the Royalist Party, from its
exile in Thailand.

“However the UN allowed the losers to form a government, after they
resisted the result, and after the international community spent US $2
billion on the elections,” he said.

That result reversal came three years after the Burmese military
ignored the landslide win for Aung San Suu Kyi and the National League
for Democracy in Burma’s last election.

“Cambodia is not a democracy,” said Youk Chhang, “as there is no opposition.”

Sam Rainsy, the main opposition leader, now lives in exile and on
Sept. 22 was handed a 10-year jail sentence by a Cambodian court for a
comment he made about a border dispute with Vietnam. The sentence was
only eight years less than the real term handed down to “Comrade Duch”
in July, the first conviction at Cambodia’s war crimes tribunal which
is looking into abuses perpetrated by the Khmer Rouge. Like Maung
Zarni, Youk Chhang spent time as a refugee in Thailand after fleeing
persecution at home.

Thailand, alongside the Philippines, was for a time held up as a
beacon of democracy in the region and has long offered a support base
and refuge for oppressed people from neighboring countries. The Thai
military has occupied a largely background role since a failed attempt
at governing after the September 2006 coup, but remains hugely
influential, part of what scholar Dr. Thitinan Pongsudhirak calls it a
long-established “holy trinity” of bureaucrats and royalists, who are
now “afraid to make any concessions” to opposition groups such as the
Redshirts, “for fear that one may lead to losing all.”

Coupled with the use of emergency laws and a system whereby citizens
can randomly sue one another on lese majeste charges, the result is
declining freedom of speech and deteriorating democratic standards, he
warned.

The Thai Army reserves a right for itself to intervene politically, as
outlined by new army head Gen. Prayuth recently, who commented “the
army would like to stay out of politics, but is willing to come in, if
necessary.”

Ethnic conflicts inside Burma remain unresolved, with calls for
reconciliation before elections going unheeded by the ruling military.
More fighting would see more refugees flow into Thailand, on top of
the 140,000 already in camps along the border.

“I don’t see much happening in the way of contingency planning by the
Thai authorities or the military for this,” said Thitinan.

For Indonesia, resolving ethnic conflict has been a key aspect of its
democratic transition, according to Ambassador Mohammed Hatta, the
country’s representative in Thailand.

“We have 465 ethnic groups, with different languages and religions,”
he said, and claimed that “once we found out the core issues of ethnic
conflict,” the country tried to resolve them, pointing to the example
of Aceh. However, human rights abuses continue in West Papua,
according to activists.

The ambassador pointed out that Indonesia has elections at all levels
of government, and that associated institutions, such as an
anti-corruption commission, the judiciary, parliament, are working to
entrench democracy in the country.

Such an over-emphasis on institutions is flawed, according to Zarni,
who pointed out that the proliferation of councils and commissions
under Burma’s Ne Win regime remained under strict junta control. He
said he anticipates the same under the post-election system, where
Burma will have regional parliaments, as well as a central upper and
lower house, all dominated by the military and allied parties.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: